<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Interesting Figures</title>
	<link>http://signals.auditblogs.com/2008/01/03/some-interesting-figures/</link>
	<description>Everyone knows how to average</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: uced</title>
		<link>http://signals.auditblogs.com/2008/01/03/some-interesting-figures/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>uced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://signals.auditblogs.com/2008/01/03/some-interesting-figures/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>David,

no matter who is the first to note, the important thing is to get the message through.

It is quite interesting that 'CIs and end-point padding' has not been topical in mainstream climate science until 'cold' January 2008 ( http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/ )

And take a good look at figure 2. That's the real headline story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>no matter who is the first to note, the important thing is to get the message through.</p>
<p>It is quite interesting that &#8216;CIs and end-point padding&#8217; has not been topical in mainstream climate science until &#8216;cold&#8217; January 2008 ( <a href="http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/" rel="nofollow">http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/</a> )</p>
<p>And take a good look at figure 2. That&#8217;s the real headline story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://signals.auditblogs.com/2008/01/03/some-interesting-figures/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>David Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://signals.auditblogs.com/2008/01/03/some-interesting-figures/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Hi UC,
Thanks for the comment on http://landshape.org/enm/confidence-limits-of-minimum-roughness-criterion/.  Your figure 3 looks like the same issue of expansion of confidence at ends due to padding, so first credit to you.  Some errors are so obvious you think someone else would have found them.  Must be that 'tacit knowledge' that Gavin talks about.  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi UC,<br />
Thanks for the comment on <a href="http://landshape.org/enm/confidence-limits-of-minimum-roughness-criterion/." rel="nofollow">http://landshape.org/enm/confidence-limits-of-minimum-roughness-criterion/.</a>  Your figure 3 looks like the same issue of expansion of confidence at ends due to padding, so first credit to you.  Some errors are so obvious you think someone else would have found them.  Must be that &#8216;tacit knowledge&#8217; that Gavin talks about.  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
